Complementariedad de las terapias sustitutivas renales en pacientes críticos

  • María Eugenia Nicolini Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Médico Policial Churruca-Visca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • María Marina Papaginovic Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Médico Policial Churruca-Visca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Marcelo Serrano Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Médico Policial Churruca-Visca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Fernanda Flores Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Médico Policial Churruca-Visca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Alejandra Ortiz Mayor Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Médico Policial Churruca-Visca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Ricardo Martínez Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Médico Policial Churruca-Visca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Palabras clave: terapias de reemplazo renal, enfermedad renal crónica, cuidados críticos, complementariedad, modalidades, pacientes críticos, terapia de reemplazo renal intermitente, terapia de reemplazo renal continua, diálisis renal, hemodiálisis, hemodiafiltración

Citas

1) Friedrich JO, Wald R, Bagshaw SM, Burns KE, Adhikari NK. Hemofiltration compared to hemodialysis for acute kidney injury: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2012;16(4):R146. doi: 10.1186/cc11458.

2) Kellum JA, Angus DC, Johnson JP, Leblanc M, Griffin M, Ramakrishnan N, et al. Continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(1):29-37. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1159-4.

3) Uchino S, Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, Schetz MR, et al. Patient and kidney survival by dialysis modality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Int J Artif Organs. 2007;30(4):281-92. doi: 10.1177/039139880703000402.

4) Bagshaw SM, Berthiaume LR, Delaney A, Bellomo R. Continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(2):610-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0B013E3181611F552.

5) Schoenfelder T, Chen X, Bleß HH. Effects of continuous and intermittent renal replacement therapies among adult patients with acute kidney injury. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2017;13:doc01. doi: 10.3205/hta000127.

6) Ronco C, Bagshaw SM, Gibney RT, Bellomo R. Outcome comparisons of intermittent and continuous therapies in acute kidney injury: what do they mean? Int J Artif Organs. 2008;31(3):213-20. doi: 10.1177/039139880803100304.

7) Vanholder R, Van Biesen W, Hoste E, Lameire N. Pro/con debate: continuous versus intermittent dialysis for acute kidney injury: a never-ending story yet approaching the finish? Crit Care. 2011;15(1):204. doi: 10.1186/cc9345.

8) Mehta RL, Mcdonald B, Gabbai FB, Pahl M, Pascual MTA, Farkas A, et al. A randomized clinical trial of continuous versus intermittent dialysis for acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2001;60(3):1154-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.0600031154.x.

9) Pannu N, Klarenbach S, Wiebe N, Manns B, Tonelli M; Alberta Kidney Disease Network. Renal replacement therapy in patients with acute renal failure: a systematic review. JAMA. 2008;299(7):793-805. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.7.793.
Publicado
2020-12-15
Cómo citar
1.
Nicolini ME, Papaginovic MM, Serrano M, Flores F, Ortiz Mayor A, Martínez R. Complementariedad de las terapias sustitutivas renales en pacientes críticos. Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl. [Internet]. 15 de diciembre de 2020 [citado 17 de abril de 2024];40(4):320-4. Disponible en: http://vps-1689312-x.dattaweb.com/index.php/rndt/article/view/574
Sección
Casuística